After watching the
video "What is a Monopoly,"
respond to the questions below:
1. What are the
three main characteristics that make a firm a monopoly?
2. How does a
monopoly firm decide how much to produce and what price to charge?
3. What are the
costs and benefits of monopoly to the monopolist firm and to society?
4. In the video, one commentator mentions
some of the problems with monopolies, but he says that those aren't what
economists are concerned with. What are the problems he is referring to? If
economists are not concerned with those problems, what are they concerned
about? Do you agree with their concerns?
5. Monopolies are
often looked at as bad. Can they also be good? Under what circumstances could a
monopoly be a good thing?
6. Given that in
the long run monopolists spend all of their surplus in maintaining their
monopoly position, do you think it is worth it to try to attain a monopoly? Why
or why not?
- The three
main characteristics that main a firm a monopoly are that there is only
one firm in the market, the product is unique and there are no substitutes
for it, and there are barriers to entry for the market.
- Monopoly
decides how much to produce by choosing the quantity where marginal cost
equals to marginal revenue, and it decides how to charge its product by
charging the highest price that people are willing to pay on the market
demand curve for the good.
- The costs of
monopolies are that a deadweight loss arises when the monopoly is not
completely efficient. The benefits of monopolies are that monopolies
encourage innovation and research (since there are patents), and society
can enjoy cheaper prices since only one firm supplies a product, and a
larger quantity supplied means that average total cost is spread out,
lowering the costs.
- The problem
that the economists are not concerned with is the transferring of income
from consumers to monopolists, and that in competitive markets, prices
will be lower and quantity produced will be higher. The economists are
concerned with the inefficiency and efficiency of monopolies, and whether
or not deadweight lost arises. If talking about fairness, then I do not
agree with the economist's concern about efficiency. However, if talking
about productivity and the use of resources, then yes, I do agree with the
economists view for efficient monopolies.
- Monopolies
can be considered good because if the average cost is decreasing, then
there are advantages to large scale manufacturing and production.
- If, in the
long run, a monopoly spends all of its surplus to maintain its position,
then it is not worth it to attain a monopoly because it would mean that a
lot of resources that could be used for other things would be wasted and
not properly distributed between the consumers and the producers, which is
a huge opportunity cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment